Sure, please provide the title you would like me to rewrite using the Mahayana Schools of Thought.

Sure, please provide the title you would like me to rewrite using the Mahayana Schools of Thought.

10 Min Read

Category: Buddhist Path | Mindfulness Articles | Latest Meditation Insights


Why Philosophy is Essential in Buddhism

In this exploration, we will delve into the two primary philosophical traditions within Mahayana Buddhism: Madhyamaka and Yogacara, also referred to as Cittamatra. Many individuals are drawn to Buddhist meditation and contemplative practices due to their potential to cultivate essential personal qualities, enhance our character, alleviate suffering, and enable us to contribute to the alleviation of others’ suffering. At times, it may seem that probing into philosophical intricacies is irrelevant.

Understanding Buddhist philosophy is crucial because these schools represent distinct methodologies for interpreting and engaging with reality; they shape our comprehension of knowledge and perception. This is vitally important, as our misunderstandings of reality lead to suffering.

Our distorted perceptions perpetuate cycles of suffering, making it essential to grasp the nature of reality. Engaging with Buddhist philosophical schools isn’t merely a trivial pursuit akin to debating abstract concepts; rather, they offer profound insights that significantly influence our lives. They shape our interactions with the world, our self-perception, and our understanding of knowledge and reality.

Generally, there are four primary schools of Buddhist philosophy, each offering a unique perspective on questioning reality and its phenomena. They address inquiries such as: What constitutes true reality? How can we ascertain any truths about it? How do we cultivate accurate perceptions?

The Madhyamaka and Cittamatra schools expand upon the foundational methods of understanding found in earlier Buddhist traditions. These four schools are often presented in a hierarchical manner, with Madhyamaka typically positioned at the pinnacle. However, this doesn’t imply that we should abandon the other philosophies; rather, each school serves a distinct purpose in different contexts and practices. Each philosophy is suitable for particular circumstances, providing insights in varied settings.

It is essential not to disregard any Buddhist philosophical school. If one resonates more with your meditation experiences, embrace it. There is no issue if Cittamatra aligns better with your meditation journey than Madhyamaka. Our goal is not to adhere to a specific doctrine but to acquire tools that foster critical, clear, and systematic thinking, facilitating our practice and life overall.

The Cittamatra School

The term Citta translates to “mind,” while matra signifies “only” or “exclusively,” leading to the name Cittamatra, which is often referred to as the Mind-Only School. This characterization simplifies a complex system of thought and reality interpretation. Cittamatra is also widely recognized as Yogacara.

Yoga, a term many associate with physical postures, actually signifies union. It derives from the Sanskrit root yuj, which conveys the idea of bringing together, similar to how oxen or horses are yoked. In a broader context, whether in Buddhist, Hindu, or any contemplative tradition, practice embodies the concept of unification. In meditation, for instance, we unify our concentration with our body, breath, and awareness. Each of these elements plays a role in our understanding of yoga, which fundamentally translates to practice.

Cara indicates engagement along a path, and thus Yogacara represents the journey of practitioners—specifically, the meditators’ school. This designation does not imply that followers of other Buddhist schools do not engage in meditation; they certainly do. What distinguishes Yogacara is its focus on describing reality from the meditator’s perspective, emphasizing the experience of those who prioritize meditation.

The Yogacara framework articulates the nature of the mind and reality based on deep meditative practices such as retreats. It provides a nuanced understanding of how the mind operates, encouraging us to view all perceptions as mental constructs, hence earning its designation as the Mind-Only school.

During meditation, if you find yourself recalling a vivid interaction with someone that stirs up emotions, it’s essential to recognize that in that moment, you are solely engaging with your mind, not the other person. Thus, it is indeed a matter of mind alone. Yogacara does not assert that phenomenal reality is non-existent; rather, it emphasizes the aspects of perception we actively work with during practice.

Yogacara offers a detailed framework for understanding the mind, which includes the six senses related to the external world—eyes, ears, nose, tongue for taste, body for touch and proprioception—and the aspect of mind that synthesizes the information gathered by these senses, along with mental objects such as thoughts and emotions.

At the foundation lies the alaya, or storehouse consciousness, which serves as a deep reservoir of awareness carrying karmic imprints. This consciousness functions as a bridge—often referred to as the seventh consciousness—connecting the alaya with sensory experiences. Its role is to focus on the alaya and mistakenly identify it as the true self or ego, leading to its designation as afflicted consciousness. Together, the six senses, the seventh consciousness, and the eighth consciousness (alaya) constitute the eight consciousnesses central to this philosophical school. Whether referred to as Yogacara or Cittamatra, this school presents an intricate and effective framework for analyzing the mind and its activities.

The Madhyamaka School

Next, we turn our attention to the Madhyamaka School. The term Madhyama translates to “middle,” denoting that Madhyamaka embodies the Middle Way tradition. From the outset, the Buddha emphasized the importance of pursuing a balanced path, steering clear of extremes. He highlighted the futility of indulging in extreme lifestyles, such as excessive indulgence or rigorous asceticism, as well as the dangers of adopting extreme views—such as absolute affirmations or denials—and the significance of embracing a balanced perspective.

Within the Madhyamaka framework, the middle path transcends mere opinions; it involves scrutinizing deeply entrenched beliefs that shape our reality and influence how we perceive ourselves and the world around us. The Madhyamaka approach elegantly traverses the divide between the two extremes of existence and non-existence, offering a systematic methodology for examining our experiences and understanding reality—if we can distinguish between the two. It encourages us to critically assess the assumptions that shape our current experiences.

The Madhyamaka philosophy provides a profound method for questioning our expectations and beliefs regarding reality, others, and ourselves. It serves as a powerful tool for analyzing and critiquing our preconceived notions and the rigid beliefs we form, which can lead to significant harm for ourselves and others.

The Schools and the Bodhisattva Journey

Both Madhyamaka and Yogacara belong to the Mahayana tradition, incorporating principles of compassion and wisdom. They draw from similar practices and ideals related to the Bodhisattva path and are beneficial in various contexts. A key distinction lies in Yogacara’s emphasis on the mind possessing inherent qualities. Here, terms such as luminosity, wisdom, and compassion illustrate how the mind contributes its attributes to each moment of awareness. Describing mind as luminous and brilliant captures the experiences that may arise during meditation.

In contrast, Madhyamaka is primarily concerned with the concepts of emptiness and negation: it cautions against fixation and labeling. Every label or name we assign to something creates an identity, which is inherently flawed. This school emphasizes the importance of avoiding crystallization, which entails refraining from assigning reality or substance to anything. Believing in the reality of phenomena, thoughts, and situations leads to misconceptions and ultimately results in suffering.

Both schools advocate for critical thinking and transcendence of concepts, requiring deep introspection through meditation to uncover the true nature of the mind. While Madhyamaka focuses on dismantling misconceptions, Yogacara highlights the qualities of the mind once confusion is cleared away. We can integrate both into our studies and practices. It is my hope that you feel inspired to delve deeper into these incredibly rich and essential schools of Mahayana philosophy.

About the Author:
Lara Braitstein


Lara Braitstein PhD, Professor at McGill University and Mindworks Mind Trainer

Lara Braitstein PhD serves as a professor of Indian and Tibetan Buddhism at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and is also a faculty member at the Karmapa International Buddhist Institute. Her expertise encompasses Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhist Philosophy, Buddhist Hagiography, and Tibetan/Himalayan Buddhist literature and historiography. She has translated the 14th Shamarpa’s The Path to Awakening and authored The Adamantine Songs: A Study, Translation, and Tibetan Critical Edition, focusing on Saraha’s 9th-century Mahamudra poems. Learn more about Lara Braitstein here.

Share This Article
Leave a comment